Preview

Islamology

Advanced search

Ziyarats in Bashkortostan as spaces of overlapping semiotic ideologies

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the study of ziyarat practices in Bashkortostan as spaces where semiotic ideologies overlap, prescribing to believers which symbols and practices are necessary to establish a connection with the sacred. Unlike the normative pilgrimage to Mecca and Medina, the practice of visiting the graves of awliya (ziyarat) is often regarded as a contested practice among Muslims. There is no consensus on which religious practices should be performed during ziyarat, and which, on the contrary, are prohibited. The aim of the research is to identify the perceptions of “correct” semiotic ideologies of interaction with the sacred at ziyarat among Muslims of the Republic of Bashkortostan. Nineteen in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with Muslims from rural areas in the southern regions of Bashkortostan. The study revealed a variety of ways in which Muslims interact with the sacred during ziyarat: circumambulating the grave, tying ribbons, offering prayers, communicating with ancestors, performing namaz, and other. The graves of the awliya may be distinguished by certain symbols not only by Muslims but also by adherents of other religions or new religious movements (New Age). The key feature of modern ziyarat practices is their syncretic nature, where various religious and magical elements intermingle within the discourse of reviving “traditional” Islamic practice, constructing boundaries between “correct” and “incorrect” rituals at ziyarat. This study emphasizes the need for further exploration of ziyarat as a significant part of the religious life of contemporary Muslims, contrasting with other scholarly works that claim a decline in the importance of ziyarat, perceiving them as “pre-Islamic remnants”.

About the Author

A. I. Bochkor
HSE University
Russian Federation

Anastasia I. Bochkor

101000, 20 Myasnitskaya st., Moscow



References

1. Abashin, S. N. (2003). Podvizhniki islama. Kult svyatyh i sufizm v Srednej Azii i na Kavkaze [Devotees of Islam. The cult of saints and Sufism in Central Asia and the Caucasus]. Vostochnay Literatura. (in Russian)

2. Ahatov, A. T., Baxshiev, I. I. & Tuzbekov, A. I. (2016). Rol arheologicheskih obiektov v formirovanii novyh sakralnyh prostranstv Yuzhnogo Urala [The role of archaeological sites in the formation of new sacred spaces in the Southern Urals]. Uralskij istoricheskij vestnik, 4(53), 33-43. (in Russian)

3. Ahatov A. T. & Tuzbekov A. I. (2024). Kult svyashennoj gory – Auliya Tau na Yuzhnom Urale: tradicii i novacii (po materialam ekspedicionnogo vyezda v Kugarchinskij rajon respublikiBashkortostan v 2023 g.) [The cult of the sacred mountain – Aulia Tau in the Southern Urals: traditions and innovations (based on the materials of an expedition trip to the Kugarchinsky district of the Republic of Bashkortostan in 2023)]. Narody i religii Evrazii, 29(3), 186-203. (in Russian)

4. Aminev, Z. & Yamaeva, L. (2020). «Bashkirskij islam»: istoki, evoluciya, sovremennoe sostoyanie [Bashkir Islam: origins, evolution, modern state]. Triumph Publishing House. doi: 10.37492/ETNO.2021.66.4.010 (in Russian)

5. Aminev, Z. (2021). Epos «Ural-Batyr» v kulturnom nasledii bashkir [The epic “Ural-Batyr” in the cultural heritage of Bashkirs]. Al‘manah “Etnodialogi”, 3-4, 190-213. (in Russian)

6. Berger, P. & Lukman, T. (1995). Socialnoe konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sociologii znaniya [The social construction of reality. A treatise on the sociology of knowledge]. Medium. (in Russian)

7. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

8. Bustanov, A. (2022). Postsekulyarnyj sufizm v Rossii [Post-secular Sufism in Russia]. In I. A. Pankov, S. N. Abashin & A. D. Knysh (Reds.), Sufizm posle SSSR (pp. 28-51). Marjani. (in Russian)

9. Darieva, Ts. (2016). Bakinskij «Beskostnyj» svyatoj: musulmanskoe palomnichestvo v sekulyarnom gorode [Baku’s “Boneless” Saint: a Muslim pilgrimage in a secular city]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, cerkov v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2, 203-225. (in Russian)

10. Dressler, M. (2018). The Social Construction of Reality (1966) Revisited: Epistemology and Theorizing in the Study of Religion. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 31(2), 120-151. doi:10.1163/15700682-12341434

11. Garadja, V. (1995). Sociologiya religii. Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov i aspirantov gumanitarnyh specialnostej [Sociology of religion. Textbook for students and postgraduates of humanities]. Nauka. (in Russian)

12. Xamidullin, S. I. (2021). Abdarahman Rasulev: muftij i prodolzhatel sufijskoj tradicii [Abdarakhman Rasulev: Mufti and follower of the Sufi tradition]. Sbornik konferencii «Vklad musulman Rossii i stran SNG v Pobedu v Velikoj Otechestvennoj vojne», 86-98. (in Russian)

13. Hennink, M. & Kaiser, B. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292(6), 114523. doi: 10.1016/j.socs-cimed.2021.114523

14. Hjelm, T. (2022). Social Constructivism. In A. Possamai, & A. J. Blasi (Eds.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Sociology of Religion Sage Publications.

15. Idiatullov, A. K. (2018). «Svyashennye» obiekty tatar i bashkir Srednego Povolzhya i Priuralya [“Sacred” objects of the Tatars and Bashkirs of the Middle Volga region and the Urals]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 52, 89-94. doi: 10.17223/19988613/52/15 (in Russian)

16. Karamyshev, R. D. (2015). Harakteristika sovremennoj etnoreligioznoj situacii v respublike Bashkortostan [Characteristics of the modern ethno-religious situation in the Republic of Bashkortostan]. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 20(2), 686-690. (in Russian)

17. Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things. Language & Communication, 23(3-4), 409-425. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7

18. Keane, W. (2018). On Semiotic Ideology. Signs and Society, 6(1), 64-87. doi: 10.1086/695387

19. Khabibullina, Z. R. (2017). Religioznaya praktika posesheniya mogil «svyatyh» u musulman Bashkortostana: tradiciya i novye tendencii razvitiya [The religious practice of visiting thegraves of “saints” among Muslims of Bashkortostan: tradition and new development trends]. Vostochno-evropejskij nauchnyj vestnik, 4, 55-57. (in Russian)

20. Knott, K. (2010). Religion, Space, and Place: The Spatial Turn in Research on Religion. Religion and Society, 1(1), 29-43. doi:10.3167/arrs.2010.010103

21. Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A., Fontenot, R. (2013). Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research? A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54, 11-22. doi: 10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667

22. Mayeur-Jaouen, С. (2020). Ṣūfī Shrines. In A. Papas (Red.), Handbook of Sufi Studies (pp. 145-157). Brill.

23. Maulyana Sultan al’-Auliya Shejh Muhammad Mekhmet Adil’ al’-Nakshbandi. (2015). Sohbety (besedy) v Bashkortostane [Sohbets (conversations) in Bashkortostan]. Bashkortostan. (in Russian)

24. Mossière, G. (2022). New Spiritualities and the Cultures of Well-being. Springer Nature Switzerland.

25. Mukhametzyanova-Duggal, R. M. (2019). Vajshnavskie obshiny v Bashkortostane [Vaishnava communities in Bashkortostan]. Colloquium-journal, 26, 49-53. (in Russian)

26. Panchenko, A., Honineva, E. (2019) «Semioticheskie ideologii», medialnost i sovremennaya antropologiya religii [“Semiotic ideologies”, mediality and modern anthropology of religion]. Gosudarstvo, religiya, cerkov v Rossii i za rubezhom, 4(37), 7-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.22394/2073-7203-2019-37-4-7-18 (in Russian)

27. Rahimov, R. R. (2007). Koran i rozovoe plamya (Razmyshleniya o tadzhikskoj kulture) [The Koran and the Pink Flame (Reflections on Tajik culture)]. Nauka. (in Russian)

28. Rezvan, M. E. (2011). Koran v sisteme musulmanskih magicheskih praktik [The Koran in the system of Muslim magical practices]. Nauka. (in Russian)

29. Ryazanova, S. V., Semenov, D.V. & Biserov, V. V. (2024). Sufizm glazami sovremennogo permskogo musulmanina: ot tradicii k mifokonstruktu [Sufism through the eyes of a modern Permian Muslim: from tradition to mythoconstruction]. Technologos, 1, 47-61. doi: 10.15593/perm.kipf/2024.1.04 (in Russian)

30. Saitbattalov, I. R. (2021). Problemy nauchno-teologicheskogo osmysleniya naslediya A. Z. Rasuleva [Problems of scientific and theological understanding of A. Z. Rasulev’s legacy]. Sbornik konferencii “Vklad musul`man Rossii i stran SNG v Pobedu v Velikoj Otechestvennoj vojne”, 68-74. (in Russian)

31. Shnirelman, V. A. (2011). Arkaim: arheologiya, ezotericheskij turizm i nacionalnaya ideya [Arkaim: archaeology, esoteric tourism and the national idea]. Antropologicheskij forum, 14, 133-167. (in Russian)

32. Tsybenko, V. (2022). Izobretenie ili vozrozhdenie islamskoj tradicii v Bashkirii: opyt tarikata nakshbandija-hakkanija [The invention or revival of the Islamic tradition in Bashkiria: the experience of the Tariqa naqshbandiya-hakkaniyya]. In I.A. Pankov, S.N. Abashin & A.D. Knysh (Reds.), Sufizm posle SSSR (pp. 281-306). (in Russian)

33. Tuzbekov, A. I. & Baxshiev, I. I. (2015). Arheologicheskie pamyatniki kak obiekty sakralizacii (na primere mogilnika Ilchigulovo) [Archaeological sites as objects of sacralization (on the example of the Ilchigulovo burial ground)]. Izvestiya ufimskogo nauchnogo centra RAN, 4, 103-107. (in Russian)

34. Williamson, K. (2006). Research in Constructivist Frameworks Using Ethnographic Techniques. Library Trends, 55(1), 83-101. doi:10.1353/lib.2006.0054

35.


Review

For citations:


Bochkor A.I. Ziyarats in Bashkortostan as spaces of overlapping semiotic ideologies. Islamology. 2025;14(1):6-21. (In Russ.)

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0000-0000 (Print)
ISSN 0000-0000 (Online)